Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 8.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 8.3 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
810f81
Core
Haswell-EP
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/4
TDP
135 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2014
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
36.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
123.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
11.2k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
18.26k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
3.99k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.03k (x1)
TOTAL
39.29k
36.47k (x0.93)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
39.7k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
66.52k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
14.48k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
2.6k (x0.11)
TOTAL
1023.68k
123.3k (x0.12)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
2646 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
4435 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
8220 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
10421 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4