Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs A12 9800
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 10.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 10.2 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
660f51
Core
Haswell-EP
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
16/32
4/4
TDP
135 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
kB
Date
September 2014
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
13.42k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
17.61k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
3.77k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.06k (x1.01)
TOTAL
39.29k
37.86k (x0.96)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
40.46k (x0.08)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
43.18k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
12.78k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
4.37k (x0.18)
TOTAL
1023.68k
100.79k (x0.1)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4