Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i9-13900HX
Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306f2
b0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
16/32
24/32
TDP
135 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
877.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
49.8k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
26.07k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
13.65k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
15.38k (x5.1)
TOTAL
39.29k
104.9k (x2.67)
Multithread
E5-2698 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
375.69k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
329.21k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
157.71k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
14.89k (x0.61)
TOTAL
1023.68k
877.5k (x0.86)
Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
15955 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4