| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i7-13700K


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-13700K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i7-13700K gets 1234.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700K is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2698 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b0671
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
135 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
8x2048+2x4096 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2014
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
121.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
1234.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
53.98k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
31.5k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
16.52k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
19.78k (x6.56)
TOTAL
39.29k
121.79k (x3.1)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
574.06k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
435.61k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
211.31k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
13.69k (x0.56)
TOTAL
1023.68k
1234.67k (x1.21)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
4592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
3485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
9877 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i7-13700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
9997 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
3059 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
3664 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
22553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4