| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Core i7-13700HX


Description
The E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2698 v3 gets a score of 1023.7 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1 times faster than the E5-2698 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306f2
b06f2
Core
Haswell-EP
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
135 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
40960 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2014
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
39.29k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1023.68k points
1070.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2698 v3
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
20.85k
48.57k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
10.77k
28.78k (x2.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.66k
15.6k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
16.46k (x5.46)
TOTAL
39.29k
109.41k (x2.78)

Multithread

E5-2698 v3

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
533.68k
486.01k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
328.47k
386.1k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
137.01k
173.21k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.52k
25.08k (x1.02)
TOTAL
1023.68k
1070.39k (x1.05)

Performance/W
E5-2698 v3
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3953 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2433 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1015 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
182 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
7583 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2698 v3
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5791 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2991 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1294 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
838 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
10914 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4