Xeon E5-2697 v2 vs Core i9-13900HX
Description
The E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 572.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2697 v2 gets a score of 617.8 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 572.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
b0671
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
12 /24
24/32
TDP
130 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
12x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
30720 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
27.92k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
633.14k points
877.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10.64k
28.5k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
9.53k
29.03k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.12k
11.57k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
14.71k (x4.07)
TOTAL
27.91k
83.8k (x3)
Multithread
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
252.69k
196.13k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
238.68k
222.91k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.5k
129.21k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.98k
24.26k (x2.21)
TOTAL
617.84k
572.52k (x0.93)
Performance/W
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
1944 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1836 points/W
4053 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
888 points/W
2349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
441 points/W
TOTAL
4753 points/W
10409 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-2697 v2
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3041 points/GHz
5278 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2722 points/GHz
5376 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1178 points/GHz
2142 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
7973 points/GHz
15519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4