| | | | | | |

Xeon E5-2680 v4 vs Core i5-10210Y


Description
The E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-2680 v4 gets a score of 1162.6 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 14.2 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406f1
806ec
Core
Broadwell-EP
Comet Lake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1377
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
120 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
14x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
35840 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.35k points
44.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
1162.63k points
81.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E5-2680 v4
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
17.8k
17.9k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
16.51k
15.89k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.58k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.56k
6.78k (x2.64)
TOTAL
41.35k
44.15k (x1.07)

Multithread

E5-2680 v4

i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
494.82k
33.78k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
514.13k
34.63k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
132.87k
8.09k (x0.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.8k
5.29k (x0.25)
TOTAL
1162.63k
81.79k (x0.07)

Performance/W
E5-2680 v4
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
4124 points/W
4826 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
4947 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1107 points/W
1155 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
756 points/W
TOTAL
9689 points/W
11684 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5-2680 v4
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
5393 points/GHz
4476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5004 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
777 points/GHz
1694 points/GHz
TOTAL
12529 points/GHz
11037 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4