Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i5-9300H
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i5-9300H gets 188 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.3 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ed
Core
Haswell-WS
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
61.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
187.98k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
24.7k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
21.5k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.87k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
9.99k (x2.15)
TOTAL
39.16k
61.06k (x1.56)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
85.56k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
76.43k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
19.35k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
6.63k (x0.88)
TOTAL
140.76k
187.98k (x1.34)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
430 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
4177 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
6023 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
5245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
2437 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
14893 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4