Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i5-11400
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 3.5 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400 is 3.5 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0671
Core
Haswell-WS
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4 /4
6/12
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
31.23k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
25.88k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
10.83k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
18.17k (x3.91)
TOTAL
39.16k
86.11k (x2.2)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
213.85k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
195.51k (x4.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
72.06k (x4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
7.89k (x1.05)
TOTAL
140.76k
489.31k (x3.48)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4