Xeon Bronze 3206R vs N150
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the is based on Gracemont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the gets 112.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
b06e0
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Twin Lake
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
January 2025
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
36.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
112.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
14.42k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
11.18k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
5.68k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
5.25k (x1.03)
TOTAL
31.52k
36.54k (x1.16)
Multithread
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
50.39k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
37.69k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
20.09k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.53k (x0.92)
TOTAL
216.02k
112.69k (x0.52)
Performance/W
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
8398 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
6282 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
3348 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
755 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
18782 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
4006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
3106 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1459 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4