| | | | | | |

Pentium Silver N6000 vs Xeon X3430


Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.

Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.2 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
106e5
Core
Jasper Lake
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
55.66k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
6.41k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
4.27k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.38k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
2.67k (x1.53)
TOTAL
17.38k
15.74k (x0.91)

Multithread

Silver N6000

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
25.19k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
16.76k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
9.33k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
4.37k (x1.33)
TOTAL
45.72k
55.66k (x1.22)

Performance/W
Silver N6000
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
586 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4