Pentium Silver N6000 vs Core i7-920
Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
106a5
Core
Jasper Lake
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
47.2k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
6.12k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
4.76k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.78k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
2.67k (x1.52)
TOTAL
17.38k
16.33k (x0.94)
Multithread
Silver N6000
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
19.26k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
14.96k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
8.05k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
4.92k (x1.49)
TOTAL
45.72k
47.2k (x1.03)
Performance/W
Silver N6000
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
363 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4