Pentium Silver N6000 vs Core i5-520M
Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
20652
Core
Jasper Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
33.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
6.67k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
4.59k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.49k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
2.18k (x1.24)
TOTAL
17.38k
15.93k (x0.92)
Multithread
Silver N6000
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
13.75k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
10.03k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
6.67k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
2.68k (x0.81)
TOTAL
45.72k
33.14k (x0.72)
Performance/W
Silver N6000
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
947 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4