Pentium Silver N6000 vs Core i3-3110M
Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
306a9
Core
Jasper Lake
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2021
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
6.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
6.88k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.68k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
2.6k (x1.49)
TOTAL
17.38k
18.83k (x1.08)
Multithread
Silver N6000
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
16.56k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
11.7k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
7.28k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
2.25k (x0.68)
TOTAL
45.72k
37.78k (x0.83)
Performance/W
Silver N6000
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4