Pentium Silver N6000 vs Celeron N4020
Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.8 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.8 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
706a8
Core
Jasper Lake
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
25.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
5.14k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
7.89k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.87k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
1.76k (x1.01)
TOTAL
17.38k
17.67k (x1.02)
Multithread
Silver N6000
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
7.46k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
11.61k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
4.27k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
1.91k (x0.58)
TOTAL
45.72k
25.26k (x0.55)
Performance/W
Silver N6000
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4