Pentium Silver N6000 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.1 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.1 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
506e3
Core
Jasper Lake
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2021
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
8.56k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
12.25k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
3.17k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
3.35k (x1.91)
TOTAL
17.38k
27.33k (x1.57)
Multithread
Silver N6000
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
16.42k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
23.61k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
5.75k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
3.55k (x1.08)
TOTAL
45.72k
49.34k (x1.08)
Performance/W
Silver N6000
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4