| | | | | | |

Pentium Silver N6000 vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.3 times faster than the Silver N6000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
810f81
Core
Jasper Lake
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
140.97k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
11.98k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
15.85k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
4.53k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
3.29k (x1.88)
TOTAL
17.38k
35.65k (x2.05)

Multithread

Silver N6000

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
48.28k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
74.19k (x3.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
23.29k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
3.47k (x1.05)
TOTAL
45.72k
149.23k (x3.26)

Performance/W
Silver N6000
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4