| | | | | | |

Pentium Silver N6000 vs A6 3500


Description
The Silver N6000 is based on Tremont architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Silver N6000 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver N6000 is 1.4 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
300f10
Core
Jasper Lake
Llano
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
4/4
3/3
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
3x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.38k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.72k points
32.72k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Silver N6000
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.32k
4.75k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
6.96k
4.72k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.35k
2.49k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.75k
1.69k (x0.97)
TOTAL
17.38k
13.65k (x0.79)

Multithread

Silver N6000

3500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.32k
12.56k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
19.44k
12.58k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
6.08k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
1.49k (x0.45)
TOTAL
45.72k
32.72k (x0.72)

Performance/W
Silver N6000
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
2719 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3240 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1111 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
7620 points/W
503 points/W

Performance/GHz
Silver N6000
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1916 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2108 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
530 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
5267 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4