Pentium N3540 vs J2900
Description
Both models N3540 and J2900 are based on Silvermont architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 37.5 k points while the J2900 gets 34.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3540 is 1.1 times faster than the J2900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 37.5 k points while the J2900 gets 34.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3540 is 1.1 times faster than the J2900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30678
30678
Core
Bay Trail-M
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.41 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
7,5 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2014
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
10.72k points
10.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.5k points
34.35k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3540
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
5.1k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
2.58k
2.45k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.98k
1.92k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.17k (x0.98)
TOTAL
10.72k
10.65k (x0.99)
Multithread
N3540
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
18.92k
16.65k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
9.67k
9.21k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
7.24k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
1.26k (x0.82)
TOTAL
37.5k
34.35k (x0.92)
Performance/W
N3540
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
2703 points/W
1665 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1382 points/W
921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/W
724 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
126 points/W
TOTAL
5357 points/W
3435 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3540
J2900
Test#1 (Integers)
1864 points/GHz
1913 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
967 points/GHz
920 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
721 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/GHz
439 points/GHz
TOTAL
4020 points/GHz
3993 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4