Pentium G2030 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The G2030 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 7.1 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 7.1 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/24
TDP
55 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
27.44k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.67k points
452.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2030
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
10.32k
11.08k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
9.57k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.18k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.91k
3.28k (x0.84)
TOTAL
27.44k
27.11k (x0.99)
Multithread
G2030
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
139.07k (x7.77)
Test#2 (FP)
16k
133.47k (x8.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.88k
46.6k (x6.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.89k
6.65k (x1.36)
TOTAL
45.67k
325.78k (x7.13)
Performance/W
G2030
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
291 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
830 points/W
2715 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2030
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3086 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1305 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
9146 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4