Pentium G2030 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The G2030 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406f1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
55 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2013
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
27.44k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.67k points
237.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2030
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.32k
8.22k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
12.06k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
4.01k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.91k
2.89k (x0.74)
TOTAL
27.44k
27.18k (x0.99)
Multithread
G2030
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
61.34k (x3.43)
Test#2 (FP)
16k
90.21k (x5.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.88k
26.2k (x3.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.89k
4.62k (x0.95)
TOTAL
45.67k
182.37k (x3.99)
Performance/W
G2030
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
291 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
830 points/W
2146 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2030
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3086 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1305 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
9146 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4