Pentium G2030 vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The G2030 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 4.5 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i7-10750H gets 207.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 4.5 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0652
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
55 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.44k points
74.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.67k points
345.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2030
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.32k
16.63k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
24.17k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
6.38k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.91k
13.69k (x3.5)
TOTAL
27.44k
60.87k (x2.22)
Multithread
G2030
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
67.07k (x3.75)
Test#2 (FP)
16k
107.95k (x6.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.88k
27.05k (x3.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.89k
5.07k (x1.04)
TOTAL
45.67k
207.14k (x4.54)
Performance/W
G2030
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
1490 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
291 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
601 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
830 points/W
4603 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2030
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/GHz
3325 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3086 points/GHz
4834 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1305 points/GHz
2738 points/GHz
TOTAL
9146 points/GHz
12174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4