Pentium G2030 vs Core i5-560M
Description
The G2030 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-560M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i5-560M gets 35 k points.
Summarizing, the G2030 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-560M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i5-560M gets 35 k points.
Summarizing, the G2030 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-560M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
20655
Core
Ivy Bridge
Arrandale
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
PGA 988A
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2013
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
27.44k points
17.32k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.67k points
34.99k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2030
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.32k
7.2k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
5.02k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
2.92k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.91k
2.18k (x0.56)
TOTAL
27.44k
17.32k (x0.63)
Multithread
G2030
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
14.53k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
16k
10.76k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.88k
7.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.89k
2.57k (x0.53)
TOTAL
45.67k
34.99k (x0.77)
Performance/W
G2030
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
291 points/W
307 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
830 points/W
1000 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2030
i5-560M
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/GHz
2250 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3086 points/GHz
1568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1305 points/GHz
683 points/GHz
TOTAL
9146 points/GHz
5414 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4