Pentium G2030 vs Core i5-3210M
Description
Both models G2030 and i5-3210M are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.2 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.2 times faster than the G2030. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2013
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.44k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.67k points
51.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2030
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.32k
8.59k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
8.88k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.59k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.91k
3.45k (x0.88)
TOTAL
27.44k
24.51k (x0.89)
Multithread
G2030
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
20.18k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
16k
19.96k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.88k
8.93k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.89k
4.6k (x0.94)
TOTAL
45.67k
53.67k (x1.18)
Performance/W
G2030
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
291 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
830 points/W
1533 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2030
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3086 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1305 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
9146 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4