Pentium G2030 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
Both models G2030 and G1610T are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G2030 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2030 gets a score of 45.7 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G2030 is 1.2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2013
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.44k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
45.67k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2030
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.32k
7.87k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
9.26k
7.14k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.04k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.91k
2.79k (x0.71)
TOTAL
27.44k
20.84k (x0.76)
Multithread
G2030
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
15.12k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
16k
14.05k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.88k
5.94k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.89k
3.48k (x0.71)
TOTAL
45.67k
38.59k (x0.84)
Performance/W
G2030
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
291 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
830 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2030
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3086 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1305 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
9146 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4