N97 vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 86.7 k points while the 3020e gets 40 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 86.7 k points while the 3020e gets 40 k points.
Summarizing, the is 2.2 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
820f01
Core
Gracemont
Dali
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
12 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
26.27k points
28.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.72k points
40.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
9.94k
9.02k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.74k
14.61k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.83k
3.28k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.76k
2.01k (x0.42)
TOTAL
26.27k
28.92k (x1.1)
Multithread
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
36.67k
11.9k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
28.03k
21.9k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.47k
4.54k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.53k
1.69k (x0.26)
TOTAL
86.72k
40.02k (x0.46)
Performance/W
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
3056 points/W
1983 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2336 points/W
3650 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1289 points/W
756 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
545 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
7226 points/W
6670 points/W
Performance/GHz
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
2761 points/GHz
3468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2150 points/GHz
5619 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1064 points/GHz
1261 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1322 points/GHz
773 points/GHz
TOTAL
7297 points/GHz
11121 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4