N95 vs Xeon W3550
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the W3550 is based on .
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the W3550 gets 72.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.4 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the W3550 gets 72.7 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.4 times faster than the W3550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
106a5
Core
Gracemont
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2023
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
19.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
72.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
2.3k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
5.21k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
3.31k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.3k
3.09k (x0.42)
TOTAL
25.99k
13.92k (x0.54)
Multithread
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
10.79k
8.75k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
19.8k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.56k
12.38k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
6.17k (x1.55)
TOTAL
63.07k
47.09k (x0.75)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
8.26k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
5.48k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
3.24k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
2.83k (x0.39)
TOTAL
38.79k
19.81k (x0.51)
Multithread
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
32.22k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
21.33k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
12.89k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
6.26k (x1.57)
TOTAL
102.41k
72.69k (x0.71)
Performance/W
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
164 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
559 points/W
Performance/GHz
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
1644 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
972 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4