N95 vs Pentium G3260
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.7 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 102.4 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the is 1.7 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
306c3
Core
Gracemont
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
12.31k
11.73k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.13k
10.45k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
4.55k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.32k
3.83k (x0.52)
TOTAL
38.79k
30.56k (x0.79)
Multithread
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
38.72k
22.99k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
37.18k
20.53k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.53k
8.82k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
6.55k (x1.65)
TOTAL
102.41k
58.89k (x0.57)
Performance/W
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2479 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1502 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
6827 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3621 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3568 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2068 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2152 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
11410 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4