N95 vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
506e8
Core
Gracemont
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
42.41k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
114.15k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
15.92k
22.46k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
12.43k
20.45k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.52k
4.75k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
10.39k (x1.38)
TOTAL
42.41k
58.05k (x1.37)
Multithread
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
50.11k
92.69k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
37.68k
90.45k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.02k
22.02k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.34k
5.75k (x1.08)
TOTAL
114.15k
210.91k (x1.85)
Performance/W
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3340 points/W