N95 vs Engineering Sample 506E8
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 2.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 2.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
506e8
Core
Gracemont
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
37.06k points
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.48k points
211.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
14.82k
23.91k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
21.03k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.05k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
6.4k (x1.02)
TOTAL
37.06k
56.39k (x1.52)
Multithread
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
95.3k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
32.29k
91.94k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.36k
22.06k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.82k
2.3k (x0.48)
TOTAL
97.48k
211.6k (x2.17)
Performance/W
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
2868 points/W