N95 vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 3.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
860f01
Core
Gracemont
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
37.06k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.48k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
14.82k
14.87k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
21.53k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
8.39k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
8.21k (x1.31)
TOTAL
37.06k
53k (x1.43)
Multithread
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
124.63k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
32.29k
158.62k (x4.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.36k
69.79k (x4.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.82k
7.53k (x1.56)
TOTAL
97.48k
360.57k (x3.7)
Performance/W
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2868 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2152 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
6499 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4360 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3093 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1604 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1843 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
10900 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4