N95 vs Ryzen 7 5825U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5825U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 5825U gets 394 k points.
Summarizing, the 5825U is 4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 5825U gets 394 k points.
Summarizing, the 5825U is 4 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
a50f00
Core
Gracemont
Barcelo
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
37.06k points
84.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.48k points
394k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.82k
23.03k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
25.48k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
11.5k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
24.81k (x3.96)
TOTAL
37.06k
84.81k (x2.29)
Multithread
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
127.19k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
32.29k
185.99k (x5.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.36k
75.99k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.82k
4.84k (x1)
TOTAL
97.48k
394k (x4.04)
Performance/W
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
2868 points/W
8479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2152 points/W
12399 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
323 points/W
TOTAL
6499 points/W
26267 points/W
Performance/GHz
5825U
Test#1 (Integers)
4360 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3093 points/GHz
5662 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1604 points/GHz
2556 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1843 points/GHz
5513 points/GHz
TOTAL
10900 points/GHz
18847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4