N95 vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 3.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
860f01
Core
Gracemont
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
42.41k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
114.15k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.92k
16.59k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
12.43k
23.51k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.52k
9.38k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
7.98k (x1.06)
TOTAL
42.41k
57.47k (x1.36)
Multithread
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.11k
152.43k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
37.68k
195.79k (x5.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.02k
83.2k (x3.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.34k
5.38k (x1.01)
TOTAL
114.15k
436.8k (x3.83)
Performance/W
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3340 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1401 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
7610 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4683 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3656 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2217 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
12472 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4