N95 vs Ryzen 5 7520U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7520U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 7520U gets 165.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 114.2 k points while the 7520U gets 165.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.5 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
8a0f00
Core
Gracemont
Mendocino
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA FT6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
42.41k points
40.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
114.15k points
165.71k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.92k
15.47k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.43k
12.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.52k
7.81k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
5.33k (x0.71)
TOTAL
42.41k
40.99k (x0.97)
Multithread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.11k
72.3k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
37.68k
51.23k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.02k
37.33k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.34k
4.85k (x0.91)
TOTAL
114.15k
165.71k (x1.45)
Performance/W
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
3340 points/W
4820 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
3415 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1401 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
323 points/W
TOTAL
7610 points/W
11047 points/W
Performance/GHz
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
4683 points/GHz
3597 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3656 points/GHz
2880 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1917 points/GHz
1817 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2217 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
TOTAL
12472 points/GHz
9532 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4