N95 vs Ryzen 5 7520U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7520U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 7520U gets 170.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 105.6 k points while the 7520U gets 170.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7520U is 1.6 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
8a0f00
Core
Gracemont
Mendocino
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA FT6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
39.5k points
41.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.57k points
170.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.57k
15.74k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
11.5k
12.49k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
8k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.36k
5.59k (x0.88)
TOTAL
39.5k
41.82k (x1.06)
Multithread
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
46.51k
74.16k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
35.31k
52.05k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.27k
39.06k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.49k
4.91k (x1.09)
TOTAL
105.57k
170.18k (x1.61)
Performance/W
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
3100 points/W
4944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2354 points/W
3470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1285 points/W
2604 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
299 points/W
327 points/W
TOTAL
7038 points/W
11346 points/W
Performance/GHz
7520U
Test#1 (Integers)
4579 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3382 points/GHz
2906 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1783 points/GHz
1860 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1872 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
TOTAL
11617 points/GHz
9726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4