N95 vs Ryzen 3 7320U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7320U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 7320U gets 126.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7320U is 1.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 7320U gets 126.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7320U is 1.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
8a0f00
Core
Gracemont
Mendocino
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA-FT6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
37.06k points
32k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.48k points
126.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.82k
13.15k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
10.58k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
6.33k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
1.94k (x0.31)
TOTAL
37.06k
32k (x0.86)
Multithread
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
59.68k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
32.29k
41.08k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.36k
23.61k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.82k
2.21k (x0.46)
TOTAL
97.48k
126.58k (x1.3)
Performance/W
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
2868 points/W
3979 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2152 points/W
2738 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
147 points/W
TOTAL
6499 points/W
8439 points/W
Performance/GHz
7320U
Test#1 (Integers)
4360 points/GHz
3207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3093 points/GHz
2581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1604 points/GHz
1544 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1843 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
10900 points/GHz
7804 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4