N150 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The is based on Gracemont architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 112.7 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
50657
Core
Twin Lake
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
6 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2025
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.54k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.69k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
14.42k
12.92k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.18k
10.97k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.68k
2.54k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.09k (x0.97)
TOTAL
36.54k
31.52k (x0.86)
Multithread
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
50.39k
103.33k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
37.69k
87.67k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.09k
20.1k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
4.91k (x1.08)
TOTAL
112.69k
216.02k (x1.92)
Performance/W
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
8398 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6282 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3348 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
755 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
18782 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4006 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3106 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1459 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
10151 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4