Core i9-9900K vs i5-11400F
Description
The i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 549.3 k points while the i5-11400F gets 482.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-9900K gets a score of 549.3 k points while the i5-11400F gets 482.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.81k points
85.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
549.28k points
482.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
31.96k
31.13k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
28.14k
25.65k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.64k
11.36k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.07k
17.68k (x1.17)
TOTAL
81.81k
85.82k (x1.05)
Multithread
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
251.31k
205.3k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
230.84k
202.23k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.16k
68.76k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
6.18k (x0.56)
TOTAL
549.28k
482.47k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2645 points/W
3158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2430 points/W
3111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
591 points/W
1058 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
5782 points/W
7423 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9900K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6393 points/GHz
7074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5628 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1328 points/GHz
2582 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
4019 points/GHz
TOTAL
16362 points/GHz
19505 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4