| | | | | | |

Core i9-14900KF vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i9-14900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 1.3 times faster than the 7945HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a60f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Dragon Range
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
125 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
65536 kB
Date
October 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
140.62k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
1666.12k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900KF
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
63.88k
37.43k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
35.61k
30.7k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
15.16k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
29.78k (x1.33)
TOTAL
140.62k
113.07k (x0.8)

Multithread

i9-14900KF

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
754.96k
556.68k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
590.12k
482.32k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
291.95k
225.46k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.1k
49.48k (x1.7)
TOTAL
1666.12k
1313.94k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i9-14900KF
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6040 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4721 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2336 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
13329 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-14900KF
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10647 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5935 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3114 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3740 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
23437 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4