| | | | | | |

Core i9-14900KF vs Ryzen 9 3950X


Description
The i9-14900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3950X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the 3950X gets 959.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 1.7 times faster than the 3950X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
16/32
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
October 2023
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
140.62k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
1666.12k points
959.77k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900KF
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
63.88k
16.49k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
35.61k
26.16k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
7.9k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
22.4k (x1)
TOTAL
140.62k
72.95k (x0.52)

Multithread

i9-14900KF

3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
754.96k
334.49k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
590.12k
423.74k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
291.95k
187.85k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.1k
13.69k (x0.47)
TOTAL
1666.12k
959.77k (x0.58)

Performance/W
i9-14900KF
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6040 points/W
3186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4721 points/W
4036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2336 points/W
1789 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
130 points/W
TOTAL
13329 points/W
9141 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-14900KF
3950X
Test#1 (Integers)
10647 points/GHz
3509 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5935 points/GHz
5566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3114 points/GHz
1681 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3740 points/GHz
4765 points/GHz
TOTAL
23437 points/GHz
15522 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4