Core i9-14900KF vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i9-14900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 2.4 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 2.4 times faster than the 3900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b0671
870f10
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
12/24
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
October 2023
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
140.62k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
1666.12k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900KF
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
63.88k
16.85k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
35.61k
26.03k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
9.54k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
22.55k (x1)
TOTAL
140.62k
74.97k (x0.53)
Multithread
i9-14900KF
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
754.96k
229.41k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
590.12k
292.81k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
291.95k
128.48k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.1k
36.8k (x1.26)
TOTAL
1666.12k
687.5k (x0.41)
Performance/W
i9-14900KF
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6040 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4721 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2336 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
13329 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-14900KF
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
10647 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5935 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3114 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3740 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
23437 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4