| | | | | | |

Core i9-14900KF vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D


Description
The i9-14900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5700X3D is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the 5700X3D gets 599.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 2.8 times faster than the 5700X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a20f12
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Vermeer
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
98304 kB
Date
October 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
140.62k points
77.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
1666.12k points
599.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900KF
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
63.88k
21.08k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
35.61k
23.19k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
10.51k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
22.82k (x1.02)
TOTAL
140.62k
77.6k (x0.55)

Multithread

i9-14900KF

5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
754.96k
167.11k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
590.12k
218.19k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
291.95k
100.5k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.1k
113.87k (x3.91)
TOTAL
1666.12k
599.67k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i9-14900KF
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6040 points/W
1592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4721 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2336 points/W
957 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
1084 points/W
TOTAL
13329 points/W
5711 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-14900KF
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
10647 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5935 points/GHz
5656 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3114 points/GHz
2564 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3740 points/GHz
5567 points/GHz
TOTAL
23437 points/GHz
18926 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4