| | | | | | |

Core i9-14900KF vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i9-14900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 4.8 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a50f00
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
24/32
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2023
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
140.62k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
1666.12k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900KF
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
63.88k
22.16k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
35.61k
24.46k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
10.71k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
22.44k (x1)
TOTAL
140.62k
79.76k (x0.57)

Multithread

i9-14900KF

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
754.96k
112.5k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
590.12k
153.92k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
291.95k
67.75k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.1k
11.47k (x0.39)
TOTAL
1666.12k
345.64k (x0.21)

Performance/W
i9-14900KF
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
6040 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4721 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2336 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
13329 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-14900KF
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
10647 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5935 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3114 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3740 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
23437 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4