| | | | | | |

Core i9-14900KF vs i7-11700


Description
The i9-14900KF is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-14900KF gets a score of 1666.1 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900KF is 2.3 times faster than the i7-11700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
a0671
Core
Raptor Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
24/32
8/16
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x2048/4x4096 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
36864 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
140.62k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
1666.12k points
728.98k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-14900KF
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
63.88k
35.12k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
35.61k
29.24k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
12.56k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
21.95k (x0.98)
TOTAL
140.62k
98.87k (x0.7)

Multithread

i9-14900KF

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
754.96k
304k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
590.12k
304.7k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
291.95k
109.64k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.1k
10.64k (x0.37)
TOTAL
1666.12k
728.98k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i9-14900KF
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
6040 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4721 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2336 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
13329 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-14900KF
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
10647 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5935 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3114 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3740 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
23437 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4