Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 5 5500U
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 5500U gets 257.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.8 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 5500U gets 257.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.8 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
860f81
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Lucienne
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/12
TDP
165 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
52.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
257.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
14.87k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
22.53k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
8.37k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
6.46k (x0.63)
TOTAL
68.33k
52.23k (x0.76)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
87.91k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
116.93k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
47.64k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
4.77k (x0.21)
TOTAL
1241.12k
257.24k (x0.21)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
5861 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
7795 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
3176 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
318 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
17149 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3717 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5633 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2092 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1615 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
13057 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4