| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.4 times faster than the i9-13900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
b0671
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Cascade Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
18/36
24/32
TDP
165 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
36864 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
877.5k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
28.5k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
29.03k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
11.57k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
14.71k (x1.57)
TOTAL
55.38k
83.8k (x1.51)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
196.13k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
222.91k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
129.21k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
24.26k (x1.09)
TOTAL
973.92k
572.52k (x0.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
49.8k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
26.07k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
13.65k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
15.38k (x1.51)
TOTAL
68.33k
104.9k (x1.54)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
375.69k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
329.21k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
157.71k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
14.89k (x0.65)
TOTAL
1241.12k
877.5k (x0.71)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4