| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900X vs i9-12900HK


Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i9-12900HK gets 622.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1 times faster than the i9-12900HK. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
906a3
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
10/20
14/20
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
68.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
622.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
30.51k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
18.67k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
9.69k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
9.55k (x1.11)
TOTAL
62.28k
68.43k (x1.1)

Multithread

i9-10900X

i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
273.58k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
228.21k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
111.89k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
9.15k (x0.35)
TOTAL
632.35k
622.83k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i9-10900X
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
6080 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
5071 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
13841 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
3734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
1911 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4