Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 798.9 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.7 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 798.9 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.7 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a40f41
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
87.15k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
798.93k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
34.58k
24.35k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
30.14k
26.85k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
11.82k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.42k
24.18k (x1.57)
TOTAL
87.15k
87.21k (x1)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
364k
152.84k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
340.48k
208.12k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.73k
88.84k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.73k
12.57k (x1.29)
TOTAL
798.93k
462.36k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2912 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2724 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
678 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
6391 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6651 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5796 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2966 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
16760 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4