Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7800X3D is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 798.9 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 798.9 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.1 times faster than the 7800X3D. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a60f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raphael
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM5
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
98304 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
87.15k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
798.93k points
704.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
34.58k
36.77k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
30.14k
23.4k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.01k
14.8k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.42k
29.28k (x1.9)
TOTAL
87.15k
104.26k (x1.2)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
364k
249.4k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
340.48k
167.65k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.73k
104.85k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.73k
182.98k (x18.81)
TOTAL
798.93k
704.89k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
2912 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2724 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
678 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
6391 points/W
5874 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6651 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5796 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2966 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
16760 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4