| | | | | | |

Core i7-9850H vs Ryzen 5 7530U


Description
The i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9850H gets a score of 289.3 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 1.7 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
June 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
49.24k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.3k points
171.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9850H
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.83k
8.81k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
16.52k
10.18k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
4.31k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.02k
8.66k (x0.96)
TOTAL
49.24k
31.96k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-9850H

7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.19k
55.98k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
121.44k
76k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.05k
34.38k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.62k
5.04k (x0.52)
TOTAL
289.3k
171.39k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i7-9850H
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
2893 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2699 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
6429 points/W
11426 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9850H
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
4311 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3591 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
841 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1961 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
10703 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4