| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2670 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/8
12/24
TDP
95 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
81.96k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.38k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
3.52k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
17.98k
8.68k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.89k
2.83k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.49k
3.13k (x0.22)
TOTAL
43.32k
18.17k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-9700K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
37.81k
32.7k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
138.05k
105.18k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.78k
35.18k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.13k
9.54k (x1.34)
TOTAL
224.77k
182.59k (x0.81)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.94k
11.08k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
25.66k
9.57k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
3.18k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.52k
3.28k (x0.23)
TOTAL
64.58k
27.11k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-9700K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
136.23k
139.07k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
191.58k
133.47k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.51k
46.6k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
6.65k (x0.92)
TOTAL
379.56k
325.78k (x0.86)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9700K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.43k
11.18k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.9k
10.06k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
3.21k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.12k
3.12k (x0.22)
TOTAL
64.69k
27.57k (x0.43)

Multithread

i7-9700K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
134.6k
140.98k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
191.15k
145.37k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.84k
45.62k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
6.75k (x0.93)
TOTAL
375.84k
338.73k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
18.62k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
28.3k
10.49k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.27k
4.04k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.93k
3.26k (x0.22)
TOTAL
81.96k
36.41k (x0.44)

Multithread

i7-9700K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
244.31k
236.25k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
199.72k
151.05k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.15k
58.9k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
6.7k (x0.93)
TOTAL
494.38k
452.9k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i7-9700K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2572 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2102 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5204 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6623 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5776 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3047 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16726 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4